Blue Archive is 18 years old? Intensifying the rebound of users in the recommendation of game committee adjustment

Major subculture mobile games in Korea, such as Fate/Grand Order and Blue Archive, have predicted raising the age grade.

This is a follow-up in accordance with the recommendation of grade reclassification by the Game Water Management Committee. However, there is a question about the sudden measures of games that have been serviced for several years. Game companies are controversial among users who play it because they have to modify the contents or raise their rating according to the recommendation of the game committee.

Some gamers have been in group complaints, saying that the recommendation of the game is unfair. In fact, the game committee suffered all day long, with thousands of collective complaints in one day. In response to this, the Game Committee (recommendation) says it is normal follow-up.

The Game Committee says that there was actually an image that was not suitable for the age grade of each game. It was also true that there was a complaint (demand for rating reclassification due to propaganda), and it was also true that the respondents answered the complaints to respond to the complaints.

As a result of the report of the DICE Game, it is confirmed that there was an additional rating reclassification for some subculture mobile games in addition to the current known game. And some of these games are expected to be re-adjusted afterwards, so this controversy is not easy.

'Healthy and bright' Blue Archive is not available for youth anymore?

Net marble, which serves Fate/Grand Order in Korea, said on September 30 that it was notified by the Game Commission on the official café announcement. This is why some illustrations of the game in the service are not appropriate for the current grade.

As a result, Net marble announced that it is now formally undergoing a deliberation process of Fate/Grand Order. In addition, according to the result, he added that the age rating of the game could be adjusted in the future. Currently, the game is operating as a Google 12-year-old / Apple App Store 9s or older through the open market 'itself classification system'.

Nixon, which serves Blue Archive, also said on October 4, saying, In September, we received a recommendation to modify the game's resources (illustrations, etc.) from the game committee last September. In addition, the company announced that it will raise the age rating of the game to an 18-year-old user.

However, Blue Archive announced that it will develop and service the 'teen version', which has modified resources separately from the 18-year-old version. The two versions differ in some resources. He added that the same game will not be different from the same server. For reference, is also undergoing service at the open market itself through the classification system.

In addition, as a result of the report of the DICE Game, it was confirmed that at least four more subculture mobile games were recommended by the game. All of them are long-lived games that have lasted more than a year, and most of them are popular works with more than one in the top 20. Therefore, if the rating reclassification of the games is officially announced, the controversy over the situation will spread further.

Is the cause of sudden age rating?

Users who like subculture games are difficult to agree with the recommendation of reclassification on the game, and are particularly opposed to the so-called 'coordinate' of certain community users.

Certain community users regularly filed a complaint in the group's age rating of games such as Blue Archive and Fate/Grand Order, and claimed that the game commission was swayed here.

In response to this, the game official said in a call with the Dismiss Game: Many users are intensively in complaints, so the game commission does not intensively dig a certain game or reinforces reclassification. It is a game that has been on monitoring for a long time, and it has overlapped users' complaints and time.

Currently, the Game Committee is monitoring and `` follow-up '' of open market classification games through complaints of users and its own management team activities. In addition, the game, which is judged to have a problem, first reviews and posts the agenda by the researchers from the Game Committee.

The Blue Archive and Fate/Grand Order have also been a normal procedure, and the rating reclassification was decided through the committee's regular meeting and the majority of the members of the committee.

The official said, In the open market, more than millions of games are autonomously determined and serviced. Because of this, it is difficult to monitor all the games, and only a specific game is targeted or not making a disadvantage. I added.

Other countries are aged 12/15, but Korea is 18 years old? Is there any problem with the gaming deliberation criteria?

However, even if there was no problem with the procedure, the game committee's recommendation of this subculture mobile game rating is controversial in that most of the games are doing 'global service' for more than a few years. Therefore, it is the standard of age deliberation that is different from ** 'Korea country'.

The game is judged that all the games that have been problematic show the level of 'youth use' in the 'sensational' section. However, the criteria for 'youth use', which can be confirmed through the homepage of the game, are reduced by 1. This has been criticized for being an 'unusual standard' for being interpreted in various ways.

In fact, the character illustration (memory lobby), which was identified as a direct problem in as a result of the report of the Dismiss Game, is not 'direct and specifically described' even if there is a sensational exposure according to the subjects of the person. It can be judged not.

Above all, there is room for controversy in that the Japanese server, where the illustration is normal, has never been controversial about the use level during the service for nearly two years. An official of the game committee said, Korea and abroad may have different standards in judgment such as sensationalism.

Is there a problem with the 'open market itself classification system' itself?

In addition, even if there was no problem with the 'selection judgment' standards of the game committee, this situation is likely to spread to another controversy in that the incident clearly showed the loophole of the 'open market itself' itself.

Above all, if the game's decision is reasonable, even though the game companies have been servicing the game with an appropriate age rating for up to five years, the 'system safety device' has been operating ** Because it is said that it was not.

has been in service for nearly five years from November 2017 to the present age, and another game that has been redistributed has been serviced for the same rating for more than a period of time.

This is because from a different perspective (assuming that the decision of the game is reasonable), it is possible to interpret the game's service with a long-term age grade using a loophole of its own classification system. This may be raised.

On the afternoon of the 5th, the Game Committee said in a notice on the 5th, There are more than thousands of collective complaints in our committee, and complaints of the same contents are being received continuously. After reviewing the review, we will ask you to refrain from repeatedly, repeated complaints for smooth processing.

For reference, the Game Committee's regular committee meeting is held every Thursday. As such, on October 6, when the next meeting is held, the game committee's official announcement will be made.